1. Which video interview platforms offer free plans?

InCruiter does not offer a free plan. InterviewStream also does not provide a free plan and typically operates on paid subscription models. ScreeningHive offers a free plan with no credit card required, allowing recruiters to start at $0 per month with access for one user and up to five interviews.

2. Which platforms have the best integration capabilities with popular ATS systems?

InCruiter supports ATS integrations to connect interview workflows with applicant tracking systems. InterviewStream also supports ATS integrations, particularly for structured hiring environments. ScreeningHive supports ATS integrations and is designed to fit smoothly into modern recruitment technology stacks, supporting collaborative and scalable hiring workflows.

3. Which platforms are most affordable for small businesses versus enterprise ?

InCruiter and InterviewStream are more commonly used by mid-sized to enterprise with structured hiring requirements. ScreeningHive is designed to support startups, growing teams, and recruitment agencies by offering flexible plans, including a free option, without enterprise-level pricing complexity.

4. Which platforms provide the best mobile experience for candidates?

InCruiter provides mobile-friendly access for candidates and interviewers through web-based interfaces. InterviewStream also offers mobile-friendly access for candidates to complete interviews remotely. ScreeningHive places strong emphasis on mobile compatibility, allowing candidates to complete one-way video interviews easily from smartphones or tablets.

5. Which platforms offer the strongest security and compliance features?

Both InCruiter and InterviewStream include essential security measures for handling candidate data and interview recordings. ScreeningHive further strengthens this area with secure, encrypted recordings and controlled access that support fair, consistent, and compliant candidate evaluation.

InCruiter vs InterviewStream: Video Interview Platforms

Quick Summary

InCruiter is a video interview and interview-as-a-service platform that supports both one-way and live video interviews. It is commonly used by recruitment teams and enterprises that require structured interview workflows, live technical interviews, interviewer coordination, and support for remote hiring at scale.

InterviewStream is a structured video interview platform offering one-way and live video interviews, widely adopted by universities and that prioritize behavioral interviewing, interview guides, practice interviews, and compliance-focused hiring. It focuses on standardized evaluation and consistent interview processes.

Metrics Comparison of InCruiter vs InterviewStream

	InCruiter	InterviewStream	ScreeningHive
Pricing Starts From	-	-	Get Quote
Free Trial			Get a Trial
Best For	Enterprise IT, Consulting, Education, High-Volume Recruitment	Education, Healthcare, Government, Enterprise HR	Corporate HRs, Mass recruiters, Hiring managers, Employment and recruiting agencies, Executive search firms, Staffing firms, Small businesses and startups
Help Videos
New Release/Updates	-	-	Monthly
Trustpilot Score	0	0	4
Software Suggest Score	5	-	4.7
SaaSWorthy Score	-	-	4.6
Capterra - Ease of Use	4.8	4.6	4.5
Capterra - Customer Service	4.7	4.4	4.7
Capterra - Features	4.8	4.4	4.6
Capterra - Value for Money	4.8	4.5	4.6
Mobile Application
Capterra Rating
G2 Rating
Profile Overview	View Profile	View Profile	Get a Demo

InCruiter

Pricing Starts From -

Free Trial:

Ease of Use: 4.8

Customer Service: 4.7

Features: 4.8

Value for Money: 4.8

Capterra Rating:

G2 Rating:

InterviewStream

Pricing Starts From -

Free Trial:

Ease of Use: 4.6

Customer Service: 4.4

Features: 4.4

Value for Money: 4.5

Capterra Rating:

G2 Rating:

ScreeningHive

Pricing Starts From: Get Quote

Free Trial: Get a Trial

Ease of Use: 4.5

Customer Service: 4.7

Features: 4.6

Value for Money: 4.6

Capterra Rating:

G2 Rating:

Overview of InCruiter

InCruiter is a video interviewing and recruitment platform designed to support live and asynchronous interviews while reducing manual coordination in hiring workflows.

The platform provides tools such as live video interviews, coding collaboration, scheduling automation, and structured interview feedback to help recruiters evaluate candidates more efficiently.

InCruiter supports both technical and non-technical hiring use cases, enabling interviewers to assess skills, collaborate with panel members, and document feedback in a centralized system.

It is commonly used by enterprises, IT services firms, consulting organizations, and education institutions that require structured, scalable interview processes.

Pros

User-friendly interface for recruiters and interviewers.

Live interview tools work well for technical discussions.

Built-in scheduling reduces interview coordination time.

Coding collaboration helps during technical interviews.

Structured feedback improves interview consistency.

Interview setup process is straightforward.

Low no-show rates reported due to effective scheduling and reminders.

Paulam M.

"Incruiter an end to end solution provider of Hiring"
Incruiter's interview service portal is quite user friendly. It covers all the necessary features of interview like candidate's detail profiling, detailed interview feedback and there are many more such features. I also liked their broad interview panel for technical hiring. They have a quick turnaround so overall hiring time gets reduced with good industry experts on their interview panel.

Verified G2 Review

Cons

Video performance can lag during multi-participant interviews.

Advanced customization options are limited.

Reporting features could be more detailed.

ATS integration sometimes requires manual configuration.

Pricing details are not transparent online.

No dedicated mobile app for recruiters.

Learning curve exists for advanced features.

Candidate documentation could be clearer.

Shriniwas K.

"Efficient Candidate Matching but Needs More Proposals"
I find that more candidates need to be proposed each month, which limits the pool of potential hires. Additionally, the lack of communication regarding changes to interviewer feedback is problematic; feedback should not be modified without consulting the interviewer first, as it could lead to incorrect assessments. There is also a concern regarding compensation; InCruiter needs to ensure that the agreed compensation is provided promptly. Lastly, I have experienced delays in the review and addressal of complaints. It’s important that complaints raised via calls and tickets are handled promptly, and I would suggest having a dedicated email address or team specifically to handle these issues.

Verified G2 Review

Overview of InterviewStream

InterviewStream is a video interview and hiring platform that supports one-way and live video interviews with scheduling automation to simplify recruiter workflows.

The platform allows hiring teams to conduct asynchronous video screenings as well as live interviews with interview panels, reducing time spent coordinating schedules and speeding up decision making.

InterviewStream includes customizable interview templates, reporting dashboards, AI-powered insights, and integration tools to help recruiters manage candidate pipelines efficiently.

The solution is widely used across industries, including education, healthcare, government, and enterprise HR teams seeking to expand their remote interview capabilities.

Pros

Helps recruiters screen larger candidate pools efficiently.

Allows candidates to complete interviews at their convenience.

Works well for remote and geographically distributed hiring.

Good integration options with ATS systems.

Strong customer support and onboarding experience.

Customizable interview questions and response timing.

Stable performance during standard video sessions.

Useful reporting tools for basic recruitment metrics.

Ross V.

"Interviewstream helps us find better candidates more quickly."
InterviewStream helps us find qualified candidates more quickly and supports both live and recorded interview formats.

Verified G2 Review

Cons

Learning curve for hiring managers to adopt virtual interviews.

Occasional issues with interview recordings needing reassignment.

Some recruiters note lack of deeper ATS integration.

Candidate experience could be smoother in certain workflows.

Pricing and subscription details are not transparently listed online.

No dedicated mobile application for recruiters.

Advanced customization options are limited.

Features require training to use effectively.

Ray L.

"Video Interviewing Software"
Setting up interviews is cumbersome unless you plan to use the "generic" questions that interview stream provides. But, I don't think you will get the results that you want unless you tailor the interview questions to your industry and the specific job the candidate is interviewing for. The dashboard cannot be customized either, and you will want to move things around to make it more efficient. My biggest pet peeve is that I did not have access to interviews when we stopped subscribing to InterviewStream.

Verified G2 Review

Features Comparison

InCruiter

InterviewStream

ScreeningHive

One-Way Video Interviews

ATS Integrations

Customizable Question Templates

Job Profile-Specific Templates

Text & Video Question Support

Mandatory/Optional Questions

Reattempt Options

Practice/Test Interviews

Clear Mandatory/Optional Indicators

Bulk Candidate Selection & Invitations

Automated Completion notifications

Secure, Encrypted Recordings

Candidate Ratings & Feedback Management

Video Sharing with Hiring Managers/Clients

Collaboration features for Joint Decisions

Mobile-Friendly Interface

Pre-Interview Introduction Video

Customer Support

Multi Device Support

Bias Free Candidate Interview

Email notifications

Why ScreeningHive is Best?

When compare InCruiter and InterviewStream, they often look for alternatives that simplify screening while retaining evaluation quality. ScreeningHive offers a streamlined one-way video interview platform designed for fast setup, flexible workflows, and collaborative evaluation.

With customizable question templates, bulk candidate invitations, and structured scoring, ScreeningHive enables recruiters to screen candidates efficiently without the complexity of live interview coordination.

By prioritizing simplicity and usability, ScreeningHive supports modern hiring teams seeking scalable and practical screening solutions.

Conclusion

InCruiter and InterviewStream both support video-based candidate evaluation but are built for different hiring priorities. InCruiter is well suited for that rely on live interviews, technical discussions, and coordinated interviewer panels.

InterviewStream is designed for institutions and teams that require structured interviews, interview guides, and practice sessions as part of compliance-focused hiring.

For teams seeking a faster, more flexible one-way video interview solution, ScreeningHive stands out as a balanced alternative that simplifies screening without sacrificing evaluation consistency.